Treatment of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma Summary
Early
stage favorable Hodgkin’s lymphoma
·
HD 10 trial: NEJM 2010:
o
1370 pts, 4 arms:
§
4 cycles of ABVD followed
by 30 Gy
§
4 cycles of ABVD followed
by 20 Gy
§
2 cycles of ABVD followed
by 30 Gy
§
2 cycles of ABVD followed
by 20 Gy
o
No difference in freedom
from treatment failure, OS at 5 yrs
o
2 cycles of ABVD followed
by 20 Gy should be the new standard of care
Unfavorable characteristics
|
Bulky disease (>10 cm or 1/3 max. transverse thorax diameter
|
Extranodal site involvement
|
3 or more lymph node areas involved
|
ESR > 50 mm/h or > 30 mm/hr with B symptoms.
|
Early
stage unfavorable Hodgkin’s lymphoma
·
HD 11 trial: JCO 2010
o
1395 pts, 4 arms:
§
4 cycles of ABVD followed
by 30 Gy of IFRT
§
4 cycles of ABVD followed
by 20 Gy of IFRT
§
4 cycles of BEACOPP followed
by 30 Gy of IFRT
§
4 cycles of BEACOPP
followed by 20 Gy of IFRT
o
BEACOPP more effective than
ABVD when followed by 20 Gy (FFTF, PFS,
OS)
o
No difference between
BEACOPP & ABVD when followed by 30 Gy (FFTF, PFS, OS)
o
After 4 cycles of BEACOPP
20 Gy was not inferior to 30 Gy
o
Inferiority can’t be
excluded for 20 Gy after 4 cycles of ABVD when compared to 30 Gy
o
4 cycles of ABVD followed
by 30 Gy of IFRT should be the standard of care
Advanced
stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma
·
CALGB trial : NEJM 1992
o
361 pts, 3 arms:
§
MOPP for 6 to 8 cycles
§
MOPP alternating with ABV D
for 12 cycles
§
ABVD for 6 to 8 cycles
o
ABVD alone was superior to
MOPP alone in 5 yrs Failure free survival
and OS
o
ABVD alone was as effective
as MOPP alternating with ABVD but less toxic
o
ABVD for 6 to 8 cycles
should be the standard of care
Comments
Post a Comment